<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss20.xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/think/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<title>weltschmerz - think</title>
<description>let me put you in the picture / let me show you what i mean</description>
<link>http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/think/</link>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:20:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<generator>blogSpirit.com</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/07/07/london.html</guid>
<title>London</title>
<link>http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/07/07/london.html</link>
<author>noreply@blogspirit.com ()</author>
<category>think</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 12:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
&lt;p&gt;I'm sorry that it took something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2005/london_explosions/default.stm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; to make me update. Just a quick one to say that my family and I are ok, and to say thanks to those who enquired after us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting reactions so far:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/pressAndInformationOffice/newsAndEvents/archives/2005/LondonBlasts_comment.htm&quot;&gt;LSE academics&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/05/23/go_to_heaven_for_the_climate_hell_for_the_company.html</guid>
<title>Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company</title>
<link>http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/05/23/go_to_heaven_for_the_climate_hell_for_the_company.html</link>
<author>noreply@blogspirit.com ()</author>
<category>see</category>
<category>think</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 23:55:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kingdomofheavenmovie.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Kingdom Of Heaven&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0320661/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;IMDb&lt;/a&gt;) at the cinema today. It was surprisingly enjoyable; I'd been expecting the 2.5 hours to drag on a little, but that was not the case. The fight scenes were reminiscent of those in &lt;em&gt;LotR&lt;/em&gt; (which also featured Orlando Bloom), particularly the battle of Helm's Deep, and &lt;em&gt;Gladiator&lt;/em&gt; (which Ridley Scott also directed).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The film has attracted predictable criticism for depicting the not-so-heavenly actions of some Crusaders, while painting the likes of Saladin in a more positive light. Scott was surely in a no-win situation here though, and overall, I think the film was pretty balanced and non-judgmental. If you care to check on the historical accuracy, which turns out to be quite good, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Heaven_%28movie%29&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;. The FT has a really excellent &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/d94f0f38-c995-11d9-b9f4-00000e2511c8.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; on – as opposed to a review of – the film.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time will tell whether it wins any major awards. I'd certainly recommend seeing it; writing as someone who dropped history relatively early on in his school career, the film inspired me to learn more about &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusade&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;events&lt;/a&gt; that occurred a millennium ago, but which still bear huge relevance today (unfortunately, perhaps).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;P.S. In case you didn't know, the quote in the title is by the incomparable Mark Twain.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/05/07/aftermath.html</guid>
<title>Aftermath</title>
<link>http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/05/07/aftermath.html</link>
<author>noreply@blogspirit.com ()</author>
<category>think</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 01:38:50 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
It's all over. I spent most of Thursday evening/Friday morning watching the election results broadcasts and refreshing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/constituencies/default.stm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;BBC results page&lt;/a&gt;. Sad, I know, but it was strangely addictive and heady.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Glad to see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenparty.org.uk/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Greens&lt;/a&gt; do &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4519869.stm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;alright&lt;/a&gt;; they failed to get an MP into Parliament, but won several seats in the local elections.
</description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/04/20/green.html</guid>
<title>Green</title>
<link>http://weltschmerz.blogspirit.com/archive/2005/04/20/green.html</link>
<author>noreply@blogspirit.com ()</author>
<category>think</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:15:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Turn away now if you don't want to read about politics. I promise not to do political posts very often, but the UK elections are happening on 5th May, and I feel that I ought to write a little about them. Guess which party I'll be voting for?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was recommended this rather intriguing site tonight: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Who Should You Vote For?&lt;/a&gt;. After answering a short list of questions, you're told how well the five main parties' policies represent your views. They don't pretend to cover all the issues (the list is noticeably light on the environment, for instance), but it's a useful tool.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table width=&quot;80%&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Green 8&lt;br /&gt;Liberal Democrat -1&lt;br /&gt;Labour -6&lt;br /&gt;UK Independence Party -6&lt;br /&gt;Conservative -11&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenparty.org.uk&quot; target=_blank&gt;Green Party&lt;/a&gt;, which is of course strong on environmental issues, takes a strong position on welfare issues, but was firmly against the war in Iraq. Other key concerns are cannabis, where the party takes a liberal line, and foxhunting, which unsurprisingly the Greens are firmly against.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Greens won't win, I know. I don't even agree with all their policies (oh dear, scrapping university tuition fees?). It'd be nice to have a Green MP in Parliament though. And incidentally, I settled on the Greens before tonight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you're not up to scratch with the issues, it's worth perusing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/policies.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; as you go along, otherwise you might end up with dubious and embarrassing results like:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table width=&quot;80%&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; bordercolor=&quot;#000000&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;UK Independence Party 9&lt;br /&gt;Liberal Democrat 8&lt;br /&gt;Green 7&lt;br /&gt;Labour -10&lt;br /&gt;Conservative -18&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ukip.org&quot; target=_blank&gt;UKIP&lt;/a&gt;'s primary focus is on Europe, where the party is strongly against joining both the EU constitution and the Euro. UKIP is also firmly in favour of limiting immigration. The party does not take a clear line on some other policy issues, but supports scrapping university tuition fees; it is strongly against income tax rises and favour reducing fuel duty.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you're into these political quizzes, I can highly recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalcompass.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Political Compass&lt;/a&gt;, which is very enlightening in general and also has a UK Election 2005 section.
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>